We’ve reached a point with Pruitt that this is really the only explanation that I can see for him still having a job. If I’m wrong, please enlighten me. https://twitter.com/waltshaub/status/982056240619585536 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Jack McMahon Retweeted Seth Abramson
You may want to read this thread:https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/981181865100005376 …
Jack McMahon added,
Seth AbramsonVerified account @SethAbramson4/ So the media needs to stop reporting on all these Pruitt scandals without—concurrent with that reporting—informing American news consumers that Trump allies and possibly Trump himself have long floated Pruitt as a potential replacement for Sessions and an antidote to Mueller.Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
You asked for alternate explanations. NY Magazine wrote a similar assessment.http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/04/trump-cant-decide-whether-to-fire-pruitt-or-promote-him.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @jackmcmahonEBD
That’s an article; Seth’s ramblings — which have much wrong in the first four tweets of that thread and I stopped reading — are not. (I’ve explained why I don’t think that’s the reason in response to my original tweet.)
7:35 PM - 5 Apr 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.