We’ve reached a point with Pruitt that this is really the only explanation that I can see for him still having a job. If I’m wrong, please enlighten me. https://twitter.com/waltshaub/status/982056240619585536 …
-
-
Is that why he’s keeping him around? Possible, though I don’t think so. Walt’s point as I understood it — and the point I was making — is more about the others, beyond Trump himself, and why ~they~ are not being more critical of Pruitt, let alone calling for his resignation.
Show this thread -
Pruitt is still around, in my estimation, for the same reason the judicial nominees are, by and large, a FedSoc convention’s dreamcasting: Trump knows judges and deregulation are what keep him in with the Republican Party, so he will do all he can to keep those going.
Show this thread -
FWIW, I don’t. (See thread above, from last night.)https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/982268230306709509?s=21 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think there are other reasonable explanations. The political fallout from so many firings is a real issue. I think its already been established that Trump can fire Mueller. I dont think he needs to manipulate a vacancy in order to accomplish that.
-
It's going to be a moot point anyway because Pruitt is finished. All they did was make it worse by delaying the inevitable. What a grifter this guy turned out to be.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If anything, the constant ethics scandals would seem to make it even more politically toxic to use Pruitt to carry out the massacre?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.