Back in January, in the North Carolina partisan gerrymandering case, #SCOTUS put the ruling on hold pending any appeal — https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/court-strikes-down-north-carolinas-congressional-map-for?utm_term=.lyP34VQyo#.sb91P42QK … ...
-
-
And (of course when I ran to the gym), we got a
#SCOTUS order on the NC racial gerrymandering stay request — granted in part and denied in part (with two dissenters on each side).pic.twitter.com/CyUr0nW8AI
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
likely story
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What are the practical consequences to this? How does the outcome change if SCOTUS took up the case now, vs SCOTUS ruling in WI/MD case and then that ruling being applied to the NC case later? Could that make a difference re whether new map happens in time for 2018 elections?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A likely story.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.