You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This, Schiff says, means that under House rules there has been no vote to release *this* document. He calls for the document turned over to be returned and a new vote needs to be held.
Note that Schiff says there were "material" changes. That, I imagine, will be the key issue in any Nunes response.
Anyway, I read this as Schiff's last-ditch attempt to get things to a point where both memos can be released at the same time. (That's not to say that Nunes didn't do something inappropriate, just an assessment of how Schiff appears to be dealing with it.)
Full statement from Nunes here, calling it all “absolutely procedurally sound” —>https://twitter.com/loopemma/status/958920130813136897 …
A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on tonight’s back and forth between the House members over the memo.
(To be clear, I don’t think it’s that surprising DOJ isn’t commenting at this point. If there’s an issue, they’d be talking with Nunes or McGahn (or, apparently, Kelly) first — not the press.)
And ... a Dem response to Nunes’ response to Schiff’s claim about changes the GOP made to the memo in between the House Intel vote and it going to the White House:https://twitter.com/loopemma/status/958927666836639744 …
What!!!!!!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.