Answer to your last question is easy: he’s a “short-timer” because he’s retiring in March. It would take longer than that to put together and execute the legal process necessary to fire him. More efficient to reassign him somewhere else until he hits his retirement date.
-
-
-
I don't disagree as to process, but I do think this proves my point as to how this limited info clouds rather clarifies for many.
-
That’s the way it is with personnel actions for public servants tho. If the info is problematic the agency can take action but can’t say publicly what the info is or why they chose that action because of the employee’s rights. So to the outside world it’s unclear, but that’s SOP.
-
McCabe could clarify it; he’s free to say what he wants about his own personnel action but Wray can’t. Of course, there’s no upside for McCabe to talk, so he won’t, at least not yet. So, unless someone leaks info, details are unlikely to come out until OIG publishes its report.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Will be interesting to see if the criticism is--once again--about Comey's improper disclosures and statements about Hillary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your other two questions are spot on. Without any context or details, the
@adamgoldmanNYT tweet just sensationalizes, without informing. Maybe wait to tweet it out until you know - or can say - what it’s about?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
for example, if the report said that McCabe exhibited poor judgement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.