She won’t read it, but I did. The statement about the judge ripping up the letter is false. It has a link to an article that says she (figuratively) ripped up the defendant. Was this an intent to mislead? Or was it merely a failure to read the article he referenced?
That makes no sense. I’ve engaged fully. You’ve never once responded to my statements about the larger concerns about who is most often harmed when rule of law norms are not followed. That IS the larger concerns that animate this.
-
-
-
Either way, it is crappy journalism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.