We’re truly in the dumbest timeline.https://twitter.com/presssec/status/952405070955544576 …
-
-
Oh, good. They both released audio.https://twitter.com/wsj/status/952404617261961216 …
0:28Show this thread -
Anyway, in the same interview, the president accused two FBI employees of treason. So, eyes on the ball, everyone.
Show this thread -
(I know, we can all do more than one thing at a time. I guess I still can’t get over that Trump said that and that it’s not a bigger thing.)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But when propaganda is labeled "official" more people will believe it, right? If you act like you know what you're talking about you fool a lot of people?
-
Thanks, I’m aware of the ~reason~ for saying it. That’s exactly ~why~ I pointed out there is no such thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't it weird that WSJ is pushing back? Audio is ambiguous but the WH version makes much more sense. Sanders' "Fake News" siren is of course reprehensible, though.https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/952404617261961216 …
0:28 -
It’s weird the WSJ is defending their reporters?

-
Aren't they just defending whoever listened to the audio and heard it as "I probably" rather than "I'd probably"? That is, the transcriber not the reporter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I listened to it 6 times and cannot hear the “d” sound at all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if it was White House "Official" audio, who could believe them? They lie about everything, starting with the Inauguration crowd size.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.