I hate to be that guy but straight people will also be protected because they also have a sexual orientation and could (hypothetically) be the subject of discrimination.https://twitter.com/metroweekly/status/951234962115776512 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yeah, I definitely remember a point when I was like, “Only describe things as providing sexual orientation protections,” bc, yes, that’s what they are (in that case). But, I think the purpose is to protect those who are most often discriminated against, so, it fits ...
I acknowledged in my thread that the practical effect is mostly one-sided, and it's not *wrong*, but it's not particularly helpful, either. Again, as an educator, not as somebody already hip to the efforts and the language.
Journalists also educate, and I’ve learned over time how overly legalistic language can decrease the knowledge people are taking away from articles — or even scare them away altogether. I think it’s a balancing act. Sometimes, you need to do both.
It seems pretty doable to write "Smallville passed a law saying that employers cannot discriminate based on sexual orientation. This means people cannot be fired because they are gay or because they are straight."
Thanks. I know. I've written about 3,000 articles doing so.
(Also, I literally wrote, "Sometimes, you need to do both," in the tweet to which you were replying.)
... to describe things in a news article as providing protections against anti-LGBT discrimination. And often that’s the cleanest headline, too. The details should include the full scope though, certainly.
Of course you're right as long as the full scope is included, but I do disagree about the headlines, since a lot of people read no further than that.
And a lot of people won’t read at all if the headline is too confusing or technical. (And we have lots of numbers to back that up!) So.
Well, then I suppose I'll just have to keep working my angle and you can keep working yours and hopefully the dual efforts pay off. No doubt they have to great extent already.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.