Here's the docket: Any criminal law folks know why a warrant issued in early March gets posted to a docket on the last business day of the year?pic.twitter.com/A0H9t0EKXW
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
As such, the scoop is that there was a search warrant executed earlier this year and made public today — not that there is an ongoing FBI investigation. Unless @robertsnellnews (or someone else) knows something to the contrary.
NOTE: I deleted the original tweet in this thread about former Sheriff Clarke, which was retweeting a claim about the state of an investigation that appears to have been closed for half a year. I thought the thread explained things, but people kept only RTing the first tweet.
18 USC 242 is Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. It's entirely possible that letter is unrelated to the warrant.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. The warrant literally says it's about the same facts and the same statute as the letter.
Oh I must have gotten the dates backwards
Too much time in Europe, 3/9 is not September 3rd in this country.
Hahaha. That is true!
"this office" as to one provision of US Code
US Attorney's office double-spaces after a period. 
Then let us hope we might start anew on the morrow's morrow.
See last line...I guess additional info came to light!!
I understand why the FBI/DoJ would state they wouldn’t file an indictment- but I suspect this incident could have led to disciplinary action against Clark in his jurisdiction = reason he ended up resigning?
Additional information must have come to light.
Wouldn't that have resulted in an amended complaint?
it seems it’s just an old story.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.