I think if people only saw the story, these criticisms would not be nearly so prevelant. But, when people see the transcript, they want to take each question apart in a way that misses the dance that is any interview, let alone one with Trump.
-
Show this thread
-
I don’t mind a few random unscripted interviews like this, where we find out what Trump is actually thinking about the topics of the day in a way that provides a more broad framing than just what Fox News is covering on a given day.
6 replies 12 retweets 65 likesShow this thread -
Yes, you could shut down every interview with Trump and become a hero to many by confronting him about every lie he tells, getting him mad, and watching him walk away. But, when he’s holed up like this, it seems beneficial to find out what he’s actually thinking about.
87 replies 87 retweets 546 likesShow this thread -
Would I have handled every question how
@nytmike did? No. But, I think he got us a lot of information — out of what sounds like was a totally unprepped interview that happened on basically no notice. So, kudos to him.45 replies 59 retweets 465 likesShow this thread -
I get that people wanted more follow-up (I’m reading the replies), and so would have I. But (1) this isn’t a complete transcript, and (2) I think it’s just wrong to call this stenography. You might not like his way of dancing, but it was a dance. He did push on some things.
11 replies 12 retweets 72 likesShow this thread -
There’s also this weird idea in this criticism that this interview stands alone, on a pedestal, away from the world. It does not! It is one piece of a 1000 things that will be seen by millions before 5p Friday. People will write about each thing Trump said, and contextualize it.
3 replies 12 retweets 64 likesShow this thread -
So, let them! And I’m grateful to the NYT for quickly putting out at least a partial transcript of the interview to allow other reporters who specialize in each area to look into those comments and write about them. This is a good thing.
6 replies 11 retweets 90 likesShow this thread -
Chris Geidner Retweeted Daniel Dale
Some fair pushback from a key “Trump’s lies” corrector,
@ddale8, in this thread:https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/946595543823933440 …Chris Geidner added,
Daniel DaleVerified account @ddale8Very respectfully, I don’t think it’s a choice between “let Trump say anything he wants” and “play prosecutor and interrupt constantly.” Interviewers can - and do all the time - politely challenge wildly false claims without derailing the whole interview. https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/946588634064580608 …Show this thread4 replies 42 retweets 143 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @ddale8
So pretty much this is what most ppl have been saying. Exactly this. It’s really not this complicated.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ofthestardust @ddale8
Naw. Look at the first tweet in my thread! I have said consistently that I would have preferred more pushback that what we see in the partial transcript. I think there is a failure to balance that with getting information about what he is thinking ...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
... which then can be used in that and other journalists’ reporting.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @ddale8
I mostly appreciate the transcripts of his ramblings because it makes it harder for ppl to pushback w/claims of bias or fake news. He lies, though. At what point does simply publishing a transcript become blatant propaganda & not news?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.