I think it is reasonable to ask if there were follow-up questions at points because y’all published only a partial transcript, but, generally, I do think that people are criticizing the interview (and not the story) unfairly.https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/946588634064580608 …
-
-
... which then can be used in that and other journalists’ reporting.
-
I mostly appreciate the transcripts of his ramblings because it makes it harder for ppl to pushback w/claims of bias or fake news. He lies, though. At what point does simply publishing a transcript become blatant propaganda & not news?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You literally said most criticism was unfair though. Eh, I appreciate your conclusion but entertaining Maggie’s straw man framing muddies the waters. And they’re muddy enough as it is.

-
Yes, and your assessment that Daniel’s narrow, measured comments represent what most people are criticizing does not in any way represent what I have seen tonight.
-
I’m going by what I’ve seen in my timeline and in response to Maggie, so could be very different experiences. It’s also conceivable that nuance exists even in the minds of ppl making a one-off critical tweet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.