For more context on the texts, read @LoopEmma's reporting here:https://www.buzzfeed.com/emmaloop/what-you-need-to-know-about-those-anti-trump-texts-from-an?utm_term=.uaVMqeNJQ#.ksywe1gaR …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Note: DOJ spokesperson's comment to
@JRubinBlogger —> https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/12/15/trump-and-republicans-demonstrate-why-rosenstein-was-wrong/?utm_term=.d7f239983687 …pic.twitter.com/VTcITjF1aL
Show this thread -
House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Reps. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Jamie Raskin (D-MD) respond to DOJ OIG statement on texts:pic.twitter.com/krhXh7hHG6
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Was Sessions involved in the decision?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could you answer the one question that's not mention in reporting I've read: was it their personal phones or issued government phones?
-
It was their government-issued phones
-
Well then they deserve what they got.
-
The context is Peter Strzok and DOJ attorney Lisa Page were having an affair, so they used their government-issued phones to conceal communications from their spouses. Risky strategy - they had to have known all their texts would be archived.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ooooh shiiiiit - DOJ totally said they did
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lawsuit!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it just me or are they gonna pin this on Rosenstein and sack him, clearing the way for Mueller's dismissal?
-
I hope not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
