But contra to @JoshMBlackman, it’s not a promise to never cite the DCt ruling. It’s a promise n vet to argue for precluding effect by the identical parties. That’s different. Right?
-
-
-
“n vet”? Sorry, I think it’s just a mistype, but I can’t figure out what you’d intended.
-
Sorry. Never.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Never mind then...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
So, for non lawyers, what does this mean to us and to insurance companies?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Curious how long it takes to see the details?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.