Roll Call Exclusive: Taxpayers paid $220K to settle case involving Rep. Alcee Hastings https://shar.es/1MeO4q by @stephanieakin
-
-
In other words, the judge did not get to the merits of the claim on that front. The case continued, though, against the commission. Judicial Watch and another lawyer stopped representing the plaintiff, who continued pro se (without a lawyer).
Show this thread -
At one point, the CSCE answered the complaint: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4325301-Packer-CSCE-Answer.html … ... The CSCE was represented by House Employment Counsel.pic.twitter.com/puxWq25oWy
Show this thread -
After a lot of back-and-forth, the plaintiff and CSCE agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice (meaning, it can't be refiled) in 2014. The dismissal was signed by an attorney with House Employment Counsel. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4325300-Packer-Settlement.html …pic.twitter.com/EOupCXQaWb
Show this thread -
In light of that, I'm not sure what Hastings meant when he told Roll Call: "This matter was handled solely by the Senate Chief Counsel for Employment." It was not.pic.twitter.com/VIw80K5AlB
Show this thread -
In FY2014, the OOC acknowledged that there were 11 settlements and awards $806,450 paid out of its fund. It makes sense to me that this settlement would not have shown up in the House numbers released earlier. Roll Call reports this came out of the larger OOC numbers.pic.twitter.com/PAhP9teYZ1
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.