If you criticized President Trump for attacking Judge Robart in Seattle or AG Sessions for questioning the ruling from Judge Watson—a judge on an “island in the Pacific”—I hope your comments about Judge Kelly today are reasoned and, ideally, about the merits of the CFPB dispute.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @nycsouthpaw
The Judge who ruled in favor of Mulvaney used flawed reasoning, summarily rejecting legislative history that inconveniently supported an opposite ruling
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vflores262 @nycsouthpaw
That’s not true. From
@ZoeTillman’s report from the hearing: “Kelly on Tuesday said he was "dubious" of the value of legislative history, and that in the CFPB case, the record was ambiguous at best.”https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/a-judge-just-ruled-that-that-trump-can-install-his-own-pick?utm_term=.onX6wY6ed#.wa7d25dyD …1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
It wasn’t
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We disagree.
8:51 AM - 29 Nov 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.