If you criticized President Trump for attacking Judge Robart in Seattle or AG Sessions for questioning the ruling from Judge Watson—a judge on an “island in the Pacific”—I hope your comments about Judge Kelly today are reasoned and, ideally, about the merits of the CFPB dispute.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @kairyssdal
And I hope Legal editors and Supreme Court reporters would understand the difference between what a private citizens so, merited or not, and what sitting members of a branch of government say about another branch of government meant to restrain them.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Or you can be a scold about the total non issue of what randos on Twitter say to make some weird false equivalence , whatever
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @malthusian_trap @kairyssdal
I have written about and commented on Trump’s actions often. ... But if a person has criticized those actions and has called for Trump to treat judges fairly, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask that they treat judges fairly when they disagree with a judge’s ruling.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Note I framed all three instances as to the person in the initial tweet — their response to Trump/Sessions/Kelly. It’s disingenuous for someone to say that they care about the judiciary being treated fairly two of those days but not another.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.