Well, but like, except for the key place. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ As I’ve said elsewhere, I don’t think the last line of the “Second” section is as definitive as Lederman does, but I also don’t think the listing stands for what Engel says it does.
-
-
And, a key part that needs to be addressed is the “may” in the end of the “Second” section, but I think that must be read in conjunction with the way the “temporary ... officer” language is introduced at the top of the “Second” section.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Anyway, all of us dorks are great, but I am done with lawyering for the night!
11:38 PM - 25 Nov 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.