I liked the tweet from someone that was like, “That’s the point of the Senate,” as if that answers the question.
-
-
Why gaslight when you can make a well-reasoned (yet ideologically frightening) argument? I've seen you do it many times.
-
I’m not gaslighting anything. Your initial answer is a dumb, unengaged answer that suggests you don’t actually have an interest in any real debate. You make that point even more abundantly clear by citing your opposition to the 17th Amendment, which exists ...
-
... and fundamentally changed the Senate. You can’t cite originalist reasoning as a way to derail debate about whether the decision was the right one ever — but certainly not where the originalist argument was dramatically undercut by a later amendment.
-
You can "undercut" an originalist argument? I've never seen it done.
-
Here you go, and have a good night.pic.twitter.com/z4CjQmL92N
-
Cute.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.