#SCOTUS grants three new cases this morning:
- NIFLA v. Becerra
- Lozeman v. Riviera Beach
- MN Voters Alliance v. Mansky
-
Show this thread
-
Two significant First Amendment grants there. NIFLA presents a challenge to the California Reproductive FACT Act —>pic.twitter.com/oAUHt7E0Br
2 replies 9 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Mansky presents challenge to Minnesoata's ban on political apparel at polling places.
2 replies 5 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
#SCOTUS denies review in Reeves v. Alabama, an ineffective assistance of counsel capital case claim, over strong dissent from Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg/Kagan.1 reply 7 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
From the ending of Sotomayor's dissent from denial of cert in Reeves:pic.twitter.com/eDp1vNLDVR
1 reply 11 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
The 3rd grant this morning — Lozman (not Lozeman, as I initially wrote) — also presents a First Amendment claim: a retaliatory arrest claim.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Here is the full set of orders from
#SCOTUS this morning, w the Reeves dissent beginning on p. 9: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/111317zor_21o2.pdf …1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Here are the
@SCOTUSblog pages on NIFLA: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-institute-family-life-advocates-v-becerra/ … / MN: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/minnesota-voters-alliance-v-mansky/ … / Lozman:http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lozman-v-city-riviera-beach-florida/ …1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
That’s it from #SCOTUS today. No opinions or arguments today — or at all this week.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.