#SCOTUS grants three new cases this morning:
- NIFLA v. Becerra
- Lozeman v. Riviera Beach
- MN Voters Alliance v. Mansky
-
-
#SCOTUS denies review in Reeves v. Alabama, an ineffective assistance of counsel capital case claim, over strong dissent from Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg/Kagan.Show this thread -
From the ending of Sotomayor's dissent from denial of cert in Reeves:pic.twitter.com/eDp1vNLDVR
Show this thread -
The 3rd grant this morning — Lozman (not Lozeman, as I initially wrote) — also presents a First Amendment claim: a retaliatory arrest claim.
Show this thread -
Here is the full set of orders from
#SCOTUS this morning, w the Reeves dissent beginning on p. 9: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/111317zor_21o2.pdf …Show this thread -
Here are the
@SCOTUSblog pages on NIFLA: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-institute-family-life-advocates-v-becerra/ … / MN: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/minnesota-voters-alliance-v-mansky/ … / Lozman:http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lozman-v-city-riviera-beach-florida/ …Show this thread -
That’s it from
#SCOTUS today. No opinions or arguments today — or at all this week.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rumor has it you actually follow such things for a living, so Q: Is this term looking to be especially First Amendmenty, or average (so far)?
-
Feels very First Amendment-y to me, but I’d have to look at data to know.
-
Your off-the-top take is good enough for me! Thx.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.