#SCOTUS grants three new cases this morning:
- NIFLA v. Becerra
- Lozeman v. Riviera Beach
- MN Voters Alliance v. Mansky
-
-
Mansky presents challenge to Minnesoata's ban on political apparel at polling places.
Show this thread -
#SCOTUS denies review in Reeves v. Alabama, an ineffective assistance of counsel capital case claim, over strong dissent from Sotomayor, joined by Ginsburg/Kagan.Show this thread -
From the ending of Sotomayor's dissent from denial of cert in Reeves:pic.twitter.com/eDp1vNLDVR
Show this thread -
The 3rd grant this morning — Lozman (not Lozeman, as I initially wrote) — also presents a First Amendment claim: a retaliatory arrest claim.
Show this thread -
Here is the full set of orders from
#SCOTUS this morning, w the Reeves dissent beginning on p. 9: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/111317zor_21o2.pdf …Show this thread -
Here are the
@SCOTUSblog pages on NIFLA: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-institute-family-life-advocates-v-becerra/ … / MN: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/minnesota-voters-alliance-v-mansky/ … / Lozman:http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lozman-v-city-riviera-beach-florida/ …Show this thread -
That’s it from
#SCOTUS today. No opinions or arguments today — or at all this week.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if they rule against this couldn’t this be used against mandatory ultrasounds, abortion risk disclosure, adoption option disclosures in red states?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.