Here are two @rickhasen entries on the issue, for those who want to go a bit down this particular 17th Amendment wormhole —> http://electionlawblog.org/?p=95953 / http://electionlawblog.org/?p=95961
-
-
Show this thread
-
I mean, it's 2017, though ... so, who knows.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Another woman saves the day.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The idea they would cancel a scheduled election because it might not go their way really churned my stomach.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She’s a better person than
@hughhewitt Not that that’s saying much.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Always respected Fernando Ferrer for his little-credited: "Uh, hell no," when people floated idea of suspending mayoral election after 9/11. He stopped a dangerous precedent from being set.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BuzzFeedBen I'd be looking for "will not" rather than that tbh.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good. I have a feeling I'm going to go over my constitutional wormhole quota this year.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aw, 2017 was so ready for it too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's good but the response is as slimy as it gets.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this means that she is confident Ray Moore will win the election in Dec.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.