I’m not saying it’s intentional, but this narrative undermines activists, since Russia is a liberal attack for everything.
-
-
That’s exactly it. Look at your frame. It removes agency from activists. That’s what I take issue with.
-
How many other actors try to manipulate people? Do you report those as often? Why or why not?
-
Basically this article tells me that Russians made brown folks unhappy, and not racism and police state itself. Geidner it's a bad article.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because there’s a Long history of red scares being used against civil rights movements. Responsible journalism needs to be careful
-
There is nothing responsible or journalistic about this shit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because the Russian “effort” seems to be so overblown.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So by amplifying the messages of activists they were exploiting them? Snot how it works. Did your crackstaff find out who funded the bots?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bc, this isn’t politics or “divisive.” It’s a deprave violation of human rights & tribal sovereignty, even to some random Russian Troll.pic.twitter.com/AgMTiFsQvy
-
If there’s a story here, it’s that MSM spends far too much time condemning the Russian Oligarchy when they should be exposing our own.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because the entire narrative you're pushing is an attempt to delegitimise BLM and black rights movements. Long history of this stuff
-
Nope. Not a narrative. It’s actually happening. You’re just more concerned with being “woke”.http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-trolls-senate-intelligence-committee-hearing-2017-11 …
-
Interference can be true and still framed to undermine BLM. Look at your claim. You treat concerns about civil rights as a performance.
-
That is a much more nuanced approach than anyone else has. Most people are outright dismissing the interference as a “narrative”.
-
I can see your point but it’s much more subtle than that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
WOAH: Clueless hack has no idea why people think this kind of reporting about a non-influential account is pathetic.I am at a complete loss
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because in these cases “exploit” simply means “call attention to” which is the goal of the protests in the first place.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.