JUST IN: Arizona Supreme Court rules that marital parentage presumption applies to female same-sex couples: http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV-16-0266-PR%20Opinion.pdf …pic.twitter.com/nZc2R9tehE
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
But my point is that a man that is not the biological father of a child is not considered the father via marriage unless he adopts the child
Or am I wrong about the law on that? If not, it appears gay marriages are being given more potency than traditional heterosexual ones.
Any comment? Am I missing something? Because it looks like unfair favoring of gay marriage over heterosexual marriage by the state.
Ok, so I just looked into the law more, and wow, that does look like a crazy decision to me. Clearly biology is the issue in thr traditional
presumption. The presumed ongoing sexual relationship between the married man+woman is the basis of the presumption of paternity. But in a
gay relationship, there is no question of biological parentage for the other spouse (leaving aside the new combining of 3 people's DNA).
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.