Not saying makes it invalid or no one ever pardoned for contempt. Just think, as a court/justice focused offense, adds additional dimensionhttps://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/900371297380651012 …
-
-
I'm not saying it's a close call in terms of presidential authority. I'm saying implications of such a pardon are different/arguably greater
-
Enh. Again. Talk it out with William Howard Taft.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not a close call as a legal matter, but an extra level of moral obtuseness.
-
Again. Yes. But, despite Josh's comments now, his initial tweet suggested a pardon would be improper and only a commutation would be approp.
-
No I was suggesting a commutation is also an option. Never said or intended to suggest a pardon for Arpaio would be invalid.
-
It will be a pardon, not a commutation.
-
Probably but a pre-sentence commutation is also an option. Clinton did one for a friend. A post-sentence commutation is also an option.
-
It will be a pardon, not commutation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.