Publications did the BOLD-NAME thing as a way of highlighting ~important~ names to draw readers' attention in the middle of a story/column.
-
-
-
That concern is non-existent in 140 character. Stop it.
-
We can use Twitter however we want chief.
-
I had no idea. Thanks for the insight.
-
My pt is about a growing practice among journalists on Twitter, & I think it's stupid. So, I said so. Bc I, too can use this site as I wish.
-
I agree completely. You're a good person. Sorry if I blew up on you.
-
We all do (including me in response to you!), so no fret, and apologies back. It's ... been a week ... for all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This (I wasn't wanting to call out individual reporters, b/c that's not at all my point, but this is what I mean):pic.twitter.com/IoER2Z5ftm
-
Gotcha. Yeah, that's annoying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
ok CHRIS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am glad you are finally using your platform to spread the important message
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok but why does my autocorrect all-caps SCOTT ? Who is SCOTT to Siri?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.