Sessions' DOJ trashes the EEOC. https://www.buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/the-justice-department-just-argued-against-gay-rights-in-a?utm_term=.ktvZArnwjq#.ol95RA2W0z …pic.twitter.com/xATyP8ndcV
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A real one-two punch day for Trump's advocacy for LGBT rights.
Keep in mind, Lynch/Holder supported trans coverage under Title VII but never went all the way on the sexual orientation argument.
They had stopped opposing it, though, and were letting the EEOC do the heavy lifting.
Clinton, in her LGBT position paper, said she would have supported sexual orientation and gender identity Title VII/IX coverage in court.
Call me crazy but I'd rather candidates not run on promises to change the law without the involvement of Congress.
Apparently uneducated, but not crazy.
Of course you have a bible quote in your profile.
Ignore that one "she/he"'s a #PutinBot just trying to stir things up. Must be the c-team learning how to troll.pic.twitter.com/Zf1iMghbvp
I just blocked that one, but where do you look up if they're a bot?
Click on here https://makeadverbsgreatagain.us/mlp/ and Just type their @ name in the box and press submit. Analysis takes 30 secs.
pls retweet 
I'm apparently a zero! I'm not sure if I should be offended...
It's time for Congress to explicitly add LGBT to the Civil Rights Act classifications.
*This* congress? Are you new here?
Ha! No, next one at the earliest. 2021 with new blood on both ends of PA Ave.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.