I imagine I will be able to read something by someone smarter than me regarding world history about this excerpt by noon tomorrow.pic.twitter.com/P0ns3Pqcg2
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Well, there's that.
So, this was a biiiiit of a set up, I imagine, given this came out tonight: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/business/big-german-bank-key-to-trumps-finances-faces-new-scrutiny.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news …pic.twitter.com/hHMsY54PdV
It felt odd when I read it in the original story, bc it was all Qs from them in a hypothetical way (as opposed to the rest of the story).
I mean, good to get him on the record, and not unethical at all, but it just read a bit odd to me in the original story on the interview.
ANYWAY, MY TAKE: Trump Is Angry At Everyone — But He's Really Upset His Pick Isn't Running The Russia Investigationhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trump-is-angry-at-everyone-but-hes-really-upset-his-pick?utm_term=.gtOrQXPW34 …
Trump has spent his tacky, gilded life, surrounded by paid sycophants. For the first time, he's being held accountable for his awfulness.
I can only hope this ends with America intact and Trump in prison.
Okay? Okay? Stunning follow up.
It was about the fifth time he'd pushed on the Don Jr. emails. And Trump continued. It's a screenshot.pic.twitter.com/7ZwHaWvyo3
thank you for clarifying.
I wasn't "clarifying"; I was correcting your incorrect impression.
for me, because I came in in the middle of the thread and thought it was the beginning, it made the situation more clear...
...so that a correct impression would be possible. I'm sorry I didn't research before I snarked.
No prob. Just a long day, and they did a tremendous job w an incredibly difficult interview subject.
long day for everyone. 100 degree-ish weather for more than a month & I'm an atheist stuck in Utah for the foreseeable future.
Why isn't Peter's response... Hmm. Well why not exactly? Can you explain that a little more? Or, something? Anything. "Ok" leaves me cold.
The interview goes on. It was like the fifth time he brought up the Don Jr. email, and not the last. He pushed plenty hard throughout.
"He"...meaning Trump brought up, and Baker pushed hard..? Good to know. Guess I wish for full transcript that didn't feel like puzzle pieces
O.K.? Really, o.k.? How about "why not?"
[It was like the fifth time he raised the email, and he continued to do so after. Read it in context.]
Not the way to interview a malignant narcissist. Folliw up should have been why not?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.