The NYT transcript (I don't know if they're done adding to it, but there's a LOT now) is a lot. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/us/politics/trump-interview-transcript.html … Yes, yes. [garbled]pic.twitter.com/0CeShirUaR
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The real question: Was it even "a couple of them"?
This exchange over Comey (claiming Comey shared the dossier as leverage) is something else.pic.twitter.com/Vq8EXCj4WU
"There are very few Republicans in Baltimore, if any." ... And then a not-so-veiled threat at Mueller.pic.twitter.com/Ej629pu0Wy
"So think of this. Mike." MY GOD.pic.twitter.com/GCci4SsP6H
This timing ... is interesting, to quote Trump.pic.twitter.com/x6kvTcCZa9
They appear when he accuses Comey of lying and was just discussing Flynn ... and watch the shift when they leave:pic.twitter.com/myjtFLig69
[Note that the story says that Hope Hicks was in the Oval for the interview as well.]
BAKER: "... the Russian government was trying something to compromise—" TRUMP: "You know, Peter, I didn’t look into it very closely."pic.twitter.com/u7PMIEitIx
Well, there's that.
So, this was a biiiiit of a set up, I imagine, given this came out tonight: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/business/big-german-bank-key-to-trumps-finances-faces-new-scrutiny.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news …pic.twitter.com/hHMsY54PdV
It felt odd when I read it in the original story, bc it was all Qs from them in a hypothetical way (as opposed to the rest of the story).
I mean, good to get him on the record, and not unethical at all, but it just read a bit odd to me in the original story on the interview.
ANYWAY, MY TAKE: Trump Is Angry At Everyone — But He's Really Upset His Pick Isn't Running The Russia Investigationhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trump-is-angry-at-everyone-but-hes-really-upset-his-pick?utm_term=.gtOrQXPW34 …
Trump just admitted to knowing about the meeting IN June 2016, no?! And discussing it with a couple of senators!? In 2016?!
No. He's talking about lunch today. Like, literally, on Wednesday.
Why then is he saying that this was before Russia was hot? Like is he saying senators told him they'd have taken the meeting with Russia B4?
But what Senators would he have spoken with last summer? We need a decoder ring for the word salad! 
I mean I totally agree he meant spoke to them now, but is he actually saying they said sure we'd have taken that meeting then but not now?
Your guess is as good as mine. I have a headache. 
I'm amazed and scared we are only 6 months into this thing and I'm not a blubbering mess by now tbh lol
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.