9th Circuit won't clarify #travel ban scope, but offers path for plaintiffs to get it before district court http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2017/07/07/17-16366%20Order.pdf …pic.twitter.com/8SU4GZfPPu
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
"Muslim Ban 2.0" talk was back in March when this was signed. We're quite beyond that at this point, and it's a very diff discussion.
Not sure how to reconcile your view with what P's are sayinghttps://twitter.com/neal_katyal/status/883378261165842433 …
They are quite plainly calling this a "muslim ban interpretation." Seems like #MuslimBan 2.0 to me.
What is your point?
That's what they call it. It's like some people call the estate tax the death tax. Welcome to #branding.
The debate here is not over the larger questions of the ban's legality; it is over the implementation of the SCOTUS stay. That's my point.
I don't think we are disagreeing about anything. You are (smartly) talking about merits. I am (snarkily) talking about framing of case.
Oh. Well ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ... It does appear that some liberals and others fighting Trump can't help but try to play his game.
I don't think what you're describing is quite that — though it has a whiff of it.
This is about whether Trump admin is properly interpreting the SCOTUS language with their enforcement definitions.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.