9th Circuit won't clarify #travel ban scope, but offers path for plaintiffs to get it before district court http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2017/07/07/17-16366%20Order.pdf …pic.twitter.com/8SU4GZfPPu
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'm not sure I know what you're talking about. And I have read all the filings.
"Muslim Ban 2.0" talk was back in March when this was signed. We're quite beyond that at this point, and it's a very diff discussion.
Not sure how to reconcile your view with what P's are sayinghttps://twitter.com/neal_katyal/status/883378261165842433 …
They are quite plainly calling this a "muslim ban interpretation." Seems like #MuslimBan 2.0 to me.
What is your point?
That's what they call it. It's like some people call the estate tax the death tax. Welcome to #branding.
The debate here is not over the larger questions of the ban's legality; it is over the implementation of the SCOTUS stay. That's my point.
I don't think we are disagreeing about anything. You are (smartly) talking about merits. I am (snarkily) talking about framing of case.
Oh. Well ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ... It does appear that some liberals and others fighting Trump can't help but try to play his game.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.