Ridiculously deceptive (i.e., mistaken) lede in WP. Judge Watson didn't "effectively decide" anything.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/judge-rejects-hawaii-bid-to-exempt-grandparents-from-trumps-travel-ban/2017/07/06/8e3a3252-625d-11e7-8adc-fea80e32bf47_story.html …
-
-
You should write for the Post, Chris! (but I would recommend cutting "highly deferential")
-
I think "highly deferential" is highly appropriate in this instance.
-
I see Chris's meaning, but readers may take it to mean that it's unusual for lower courts to "defer" to SCOTUS--which is backwards
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.