I would say they're representing civil rights activists, yes!
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
So no racial diversity required. That's my point: ur criticism of the oped is politically motivated and their race is a ruse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLampo
What are you talking about, David? I was saying that I WOULD note it. There's literally no winning with you. You just want to make shit up.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @DavidLampo
You keep turning my saying "something is notable" into "something is not allowed," which is convenient for your argument but not true.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
My only argument, Chris, is why you feel it necessary to note the race of the authors, that's all. I think it's it's reflexive & irrelevant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLampo
So, it's fine to mention the sex, but not the race? Or is it both that you consider irrelevant?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
It's both, and I object to such racial and gender consciousness when it's, in my view, irrelevant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
What else would it be but my view? Ur awfully touchy for a journalist on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLampo
My whole pt is that maybe your view isn't representative of all & you should consider that. Not "awfully touchy," just would rather do work.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Also: Cute that quoting you verbatim elicits an "awfully touchy" response. Who's touchy?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.