UPDATE: NO RULING FROM HAWAII TONIGHT. Judge Watson orders DOJ response, limited to 20 pages, by Monday, July 3. 15-pg reply by July 6.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
And, a bunch of lawyers just lost their long weekend.
5 replies 9 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Here's the docket order in Hawaii v. Trump —>pic.twitter.com/9jWGdzTeSy
2 replies 61 retweets 107 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The partial revised ban stays in place as it is being implemented by admin tonight. DOJ, tho, has to respond to Hawaii's args to "clarify."
3 replies 69 retweets 132 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Chris Geidner Retweeted
Use whatever words you want. Go for it. But, don't pretend you understand what's going on if this is how you describe Monday's SCOTUS order: https://twitter.com/mfjak/status/880630144477667329 …
Chris Geidner added,
This Tweet is unavailable.9 replies 3 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The administration can call something unanimous, because, yes, Thomas told us something was unanimous. But the order was very nuanced. ...
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
It gave ground for the admin to claim a win: They have a ban; it went into effect tonight.
3 replies 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
SCOTUS decision was an important victory for executive power although you may not like it's application.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @cate_long
I'm not so sure. It's a per curiam decision on a stay application / cert petition that left significant parts of the injunction in effect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
True but SCOTUS reversed multiple circuit decisions in quick order no?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
They granted cert as to the merits decisions. They narrowed injunctions via stays. (The 4th and 9th Circuits narrowed the Dist Cts, too.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.