DOJ spokesperson tells me they haven't put anything out on this. (Earlier, DHS said more was coming tomorrow. https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trumps-finally-getting-to-implement-his-travel-ban-as-soon … )https://twitter.com/ap/status/880232517395255297 …
-
-
"SCOTUS is done! No retirement! Some down time!" Trump admin: "JUST ONE MINUTE."
-
It's like wrestling now..."OH MY GOD! THAT'S JOHN ROBERT'S MUSIC!"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Anyone want to send me the cable on the new
#travelban policy since State decided not to share this new policy? DMs open/email in bio. -
DOJ and DHS spox have both confirmed to me on the record that they've not put anything out on the new
#travelban policies. -
A State Dep't spox tells me: "The AP story references internal Department communications, which we do not comment on."
-
Seriously, someone send me the damn cable. This incompetence is absurd.
-
The first order, in part, lost in court because of the incompetence of the implementation. Do they want to double down now?
-
BTW, AP has expanded its story, by
@APDiploWriter —>https://www.apnews.com/9c3d06565daf40cc86f0f80f5ad0effb … -
UPDATED: Trump’s Finally Getting To Implement His Travel Ban — And It Could Happen Thursdayhttps://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trumps-finally-getting-to-implement-his-travel-ban-as-soon?utm_term=.ly46xWz2op …
-
If plans are set & admin is trying to keep it secret to prevent challenges before implementing, that's not good.https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trumps-finally-getting-to-implement-his-travel-ban-as-soon?utm_term=.lkb9Ev0NP …
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you explain why it’s going back to court because of that? I’m not sure I understand what’s going on here.
-
It's a definition of "bona fide relationship" that will be in court ASAP: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trumps-finally-getting-to-implement-his-travel-ban-as-soon?utm_term=.lkGogy0m35#.wmA9JEnVdo …pic.twitter.com/9sV0OMfHIr
-
Why didn’t SCOTUS spell out what the criteria is specifically?
-
Lol. Welcome to the Supreme Court. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The statues allow visas for siblings AND their spouses as derivatives; this suggests that the in-law can't come.
@ACLU start writingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didn't the ruling explicitly say academic and business ties counted?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously this entire administration is all 'hold my beer.' They kinda won. Why not just take the partial w?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.