You definitely can't say it was unanimous — even beyond the fact that three justices dissented in part because they'd go further.
-
-
There still, of course, would be a related mootness question of: What about 90 days from whenever it goes into effect?
-
[Note: The "June 14" mootness question was noted in the per curiam order earlier today as being added to the merits briefing.]
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Seemed the justices already made the governments argument re excessive burden placed on investigators preventing them from conducting review
-
Which would obviously make the June 14th date moot as opposed to the review period being moot due to the time that has passed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.