Here's the per curiam decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-1436_l6hc.pdf …
-
-
Sigh. DOJ calls it "unanimous" as well.pic.twitter.com/O2NaQkXUE4
-
Asked why the DOJ statement calls the
#travelban order "unanimous," DOJ spokesperson says, "That's what per curiam means." -
You can dissent from a per curiam decision, so it can't possibly mean that.
-
More, this out of
#SCOTUS orders from this morning —>https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/879399865956126724 … -
So, on the unanimous question on the
#travelban order. There is a statement from Thomas in his concur/dissent that SOMETHING was unanimous:pic.twitter.com/3DGqnCg9xU
-
The Ruling In A Church Playground Case Suggests Splits Within The Supreme Court On Religion https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/the-ruling-in-a-church-playground-case-suggests-splits?utm_term=.tyovzlXmy1 …
#SCOTUS -
From
@lawrencehurley: On the one#SCOTUS punt and two re-arguments:https://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/879451811249360898 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're right, but the liberal justices chose not to write separately *knowing* that this would be cast as 9-0.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've seen journos' tweets w/ Trump's full statement but w/o any comment on Trump claiming "9-0". Sad.
-
Wrong not to call BS on his malfeasance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Justices can write, but
#SCROTUS cannot: that statement wasn't written by him; he's functionally illiterate.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.