Not quite sure what is about to happen here, b/c only the Chief should be handing down any opinions. Re-arguments would ~appear~ likely.
-
-
This will be, as noted in my story, a matter of the administration's application of today's order and, ultimately, court interpretations.
-
Hmm. I'm not sure you can say this.pic.twitter.com/3dDAg60e0W
-
You definitely can't say it was unanimous — even beyond the fact that three justices dissented in part because they'd go further.
-
These were stay applications & cert petitions, on which
#SCOTUS does not give vote counts. Justices can write if they want, but need not. -
Sigh. DOJ calls it "unanimous" as well.pic.twitter.com/O2NaQkXUE4
-
Asked why the DOJ statement calls the
#travelban order "unanimous," DOJ spokesperson says, "That's what per curiam means." -
You can dissent from a per curiam decision, so it can't possibly mean that.
-
More, this out of
#SCOTUS orders from this morning —>https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/879399865956126724 … -
So, on the unanimous question on the
#travelban order. There is a statement from Thomas in his concur/dissent that SOMETHING was unanimous:pic.twitter.com/3DGqnCg9xU
-
The Ruling In A Church Playground Case Suggests Splits Within The Supreme Court On Religion https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/the-ruling-in-a-church-playground-case-suggests-splits?utm_term=.tyovzlXmy1 …
#SCOTUS -
From
@lawrencehurley: On the one#SCOTUS punt and two re-arguments:https://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/879451811249360898 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1/ Please
@chrisgeidner help us get this straight. SCOTUS grants cert & partial stays. According to Trump June 14 memo do the parts of EO2 -
2/ for which stays were granted go into effect in 72 hours, even though SCOTUS has exempted a class covered in EO2 from those stays? And say
-
3/ yes, EO2 goes into effect for applicants w/ "no ties" Trump's Muslim ban will still expire before SCOTUS hears arguments in October, yes?
-
All of these are smart, informed questions for which we'll need clarification from the administration before I can give any solid answers.
-
... for which we will get incoherent word salad from the Admin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So in 90 days is it over or its a lie?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It means CBP goons can harass anyone they want, on the pretext of establishing "connections".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Awesome we don't want to become the EU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this is more likely to be true for those subject to the 6 country travel ban than potential refugees.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.