Government (and, by extension, candidates) shouldn't be making that decision.https://twitter.com/Fangirl31/status/876979232479600640 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
How much shitting on marginalized people do we need to endure in the name of that principle, though?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emily_esque
Fair question. I think the Supreme Court certainly gave us their thoughts today, at least when "shitting on" amounts to a type of speech.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Yeah, and I think it's regrettable. The government is able to police speech in the name of capitalism, but not in the name of justice.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @emily_esque
[I had guessed what your opinion would be there — esp in light of Thomas's concurrence.]
6:57 PM - 19 Jun 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.