How much shitting on marginalized people do we need to endure in the name of that principle, though?
-
-
-
Fair question. I think the Supreme Court certainly gave us their thoughts today, at least when "shitting on" amounts to a type of speech.
-
Yeah, and I think it's regrettable. The government is able to police speech in the name of capitalism, but not in the name of justice.
-
[I had guessed what your opinion would be there — esp in light of Thomas's concurrence.]
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think a single person today understands the First Amendment or how dangerous this is to it...so explain-if they GOP get away with
-
f'ing up the First that allows an open door for ANYONE in govt to dismantle any/all Amendments (including that 2nd that people always assume
-
os constantly trying to be taken away)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gov can't ban disparaging trademark registrations and candidates shouldn't ban disparaging news outlets.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
don't they make this decision every day with the white house press corps?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't that how we get Inf0wars with a WH press pass though?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.