While DOJ had suggested at points that the 90-day ban would start when it actually goes into effect, @marty_lederman looks to be right here.https://twitter.com/marty_lederman/status/870686491973779458 …
Wouldn't the Seattle injunction against EO1 have halted action? [I forget ~precisely~ how broad it was off-hand.]
-
-
No, it only touched 3(c) (the equivalent of 2(b) in the current order) and the refugee stuff
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, the Seattle order only enjoined sections 3(c), and 5(a)(b)(c) and (3) of Eo1 https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/IM-WA-0029-0005.pdf …
-
5(e) not (3); that's entry ban; refugee program suspension; religious minorities preference; Syria refugee ban; & "case by case" exception
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.