While DOJ had suggested at points that the 90-day ban would start when it actually goes into effect, @marty_lederman looks to be right here.https://twitter.com/marty_lederman/status/870686491973779458 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @marty_lederman
(N.B. Surprising that the Trump admin, in all its planning before travel ban v2, didn't think to tweak that wording to prevent this.)
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Because it isn't actually meant to be temporary. Why haven't they done the work envisioned in the ban already? They've had the time.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @williamsgoldman @DLind and
Ding ding ding. Doesn't this totally undercut their argument that this was a necessary temporary pause to give them time to analyze?
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @jpanzer @williamsgoldman and
Where's the analysis? (Is what SCOTUS should ask.)
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @jpanzer @williamsgoldman and
There is an injunction (in Hawaii v. Trump) of all of Sections 2 and 6 of the executive order. Here is 2a/b, which is enjoined:pic.twitter.com/os2w0X2xhs
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @jpanzer and
I discuss this in the post--it doesn't change the end date.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marty_lederman @jpanzer and
Yes, no one is debating that, Marty.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No prob; a lot happening!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.