Note: I'm talking about as to the facts about the travel ban—not necessarily as to his prescription for #SCOTUS action.
@marty_lederman —>pic.twitter.com/BIYmR29D2f
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Note: I'm talking about as to the facts about the travel ban—not necessarily as to his prescription for #SCOTUS action.
@marty_lederman —>pic.twitter.com/BIYmR29D2f
(N.B. Surprising that the Trump admin, in all its planning before travel ban v2, didn't think to tweak that wording to prevent this.)
Because it isn't actually meant to be temporary. Why haven't they done the work envisioned in the ban already? They've had the time.
Ding ding ding. Doesn't this totally undercut their argument that this was a necessary temporary pause to give them time to analyze?
Where's the analysis? (Is what SCOTUS should ask.)
There is an injunction (in Hawaii v. Trump) of all of Sections 2 and 6 of the executive order. Here is 2a/b, which is enjoined:pic.twitter.com/os2w0X2xhs
I discuss this in the post--it doesn't change the end date.
Yes, no one is debating that, Marty.
I am just explaining why they have not done the background work "envisioned in the ban."
That is preposterous on its face. What, if anything, has Trump done since Jan 20th, to 'figure out what the hell is going on'?
The only thing he has accomplished is making us ask the same question of him and his admin.
If I were a supreme court justice I would demand to know what they have done in the interim 90 days to 'find out what the hell is going on"
And, based on actions, the ban was unnecessary!
There's still the question of why they haven't used the time to "figure out what's going on"
Nonsense. It can be affirmed, then renewed.
The rationale was to stop a supposed danger while "we figure out what is going on." 90 days was the time to do that. If they did not 1/2
Be careful, if you let slip my racist intentions on the travel ban & lie that it was temporary I'll go after you and ruin your career!
Didn't they want 90 days to re-evaluate their vetting procedures? If so, they should be almost ready now and the ban is no longer required.
Not to mention the fact that the threat was imminent, hence the rush!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.