Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
chrisgeidner's profile
Chris Geidner
Chris Geidner
Chris Geidner
Verified account
@chrisgeidner

Tweets

Chris GeidnerVerified account

@chrisgeidner

Legal Editor, @BuzzFeedNews. SCOTUS Correspondent. Nat Sec Team, covering Trump & Mueller. Sober. Gay. Buckeye. Law Dork. DMs open. chris.geidner@buzzfeed.com

Washington, D.C.
buzzfeednews.com/author/chrisge…
Joined March 2009

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Chris Geidner‏Verified account @chrisgeidner 2 Jun 2017

    Chris Geidner Retweeted Marty Lederman

    While DOJ had suggested at points that the 90-day ban would start when it actually goes into effect, @marty_lederman looks to be right here.https://twitter.com/marty_lederman/status/870686491973779458 …

    Chris Geidner added,

    Marty Lederman @marty_lederman
    The Court should deny cert. in Trump v. IRAP because the entry ban expires in twelve days, anyway. #travelban https://www.justsecurity.org/41627/simple-reason-deny-cert-entry-ban-expires-12-days/ …
    10:10 AM - 2 Jun 2017
    • 114 Retweets
    • 216 Likes
    • Dan Thirnbeck rangoon face ass d___d b___s Wendy D. Porter Christian Penichet Debby Kennedy 2018 Is a Scary Enough Name ZoeSugar Lisa Fitzgerald
    16 replies 114 retweets 216 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Chris Geidner‏Verified account @chrisgeidner 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner

        Note: I'm talking about as to the facts about the travel ban—not necessarily as to his prescription for #SCOTUS action. @marty_lederman —>pic.twitter.com/BIYmR29D2f

        1 reply 7 retweets 7 likes
      3. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. Dara Lind‏Verified account @DLind 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @marty_lederman

        (N.B. Surprising that the Trump admin, in all its planning before travel ban v2, didn't think to tweak that wording to prevent this.)

        3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
      3. Bill Goldman‏ @williamsgoldman 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @DLind @chrisgeidner @marty_lederman

        Because it isn't actually meant to be temporary. Why haven't they done the work envisioned in the ban already? They've had the time.

        1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
      4. John Panzer‏ @jpanzer 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @williamsgoldman @DLind and

        Ding ding ding. Doesn't this totally undercut their argument that this was a necessary temporary pause to give them time to analyze?

        1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
      5. John Panzer‏ @jpanzer 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @jpanzer @williamsgoldman and

        Where's the analysis? (Is what SCOTUS should ask.)

        1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
      6. Chris Geidner‏Verified account @chrisgeidner 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @jpanzer @williamsgoldman and

        There is an injunction (in Hawaii v. Trump) of all of Sections 2 and 6 of the executive order. Here is 2a/b, which is enjoined:pic.twitter.com/os2w0X2xhs

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      7. Marty Lederman‏ @marty_lederman 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @jpanzer and

        I discuss this in the post--it doesn't change the end date.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      8. Chris Geidner‏Verified account @chrisgeidner 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @marty_lederman @jpanzer and

        Yes, no one is debating that, Marty.

        3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      9. Chris Geidner‏Verified account @chrisgeidner 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @marty_lederman and

        I am just explaining why they have not done the background work "envisioned in the ban."

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      10. 4 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Walt Corey‏ @WaltCorey 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @MalcolmNance @marty_lederman

        That is preposterous on its face. What, if anything, has Trump done since Jan 20th, to 'figure out what the hell is going on'?

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      3. MyInnerStupid 🥁‏ @Zeke4tribe 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @WaltCorey @chrisgeidner and

        The only thing he has accomplished is making us ask the same question of him and his admin.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1.  🌊 Kevin Fox‏ @peskyspoll 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @MalcolmNance @marty_lederman

        If I were a supreme court justice I would demand to know what they have done in the interim 90 days to 'find out what the hell is going on"

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Michael‏ @madarts13 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @MalcolmNance @marty_lederman

        And, based on actions, the ban was unnecessary!

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Charles Marker‏ @cfmarker 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @marty_lederman

        There's still the question of why they haven't used the time to "figure out what's going on"

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. RealityIsDirty‏ @SSeneca 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @marty_lederman

        Nonsense. It can be affirmed, then renewed.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. DBCIII - Grumpy Old Man‏ @frogcycle 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @MalcolmNance @marty_lederman

        The rationale was to stop a supposed danger while "we figure out what is going on." 90 days was the time to do that. If they did not 1/2

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Jack Prophylactic‏ @JakProphylactic 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @MalcolmNance @marty_lederman

        Be careful, if you let slip my racist intentions on the travel ban & lie that it was temporary I'll go after you and ruin your career!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Linda Gray‏ @L2610 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @chrisgeidner @MalcolmNance @marty_lederman

        Didn't they want 90 days to re-evaluate their vetting procedures? If so, they should be almost ready now and the ban is no longer required.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. Linda Gray‏ @L2610 2 Jun 2017
        Replying to @L2610 @chrisgeidner and

        Not to mention the fact that the threat was imminent, hence the rush!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info