Full 2nd Circuit order:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3734121-Zarda-v-Altitude-Express-Inc-En-Banc-Review.html …
-
-
-
Panel opinion basically said it was bound by precedent, only en banc review could resolve in Zarda's favor: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3734122-Zarda-v-Altitude-Express-Inc-Opinion.html …pic.twitter.com/An248NUzBM
-
[Presumably the court did not mean to schedule arguments in 2016 and will correct that.]
-
If they have such a time-travel machine, I have a few requests.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@LeahLitman Spoiler: it does. -
More impressively, a time machine will he needed for oral argument in September 2016.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
woah - this is a big deal since 2d Cir almost never grants en banc review per their long-standing tradition
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I noticed that. Kinda a bigly clerical mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2016 or 2017?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do they realize that they scheduled oral arguments for last year according to this document?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.