You should read my report, which explains precisely why you are wrong.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner @yashar
You're not right abt initiation, just restating our previous understanding of it. CRS flatly contradicts/who knows how Supremes wld rule? 1/
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @craigaroo @yashar
CRS does not flatly contradict. I researched every example cited in the CRS report; sorry but them's the facts.
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @yashar
It says process is initiated by any member of House and nonmembers, GJ, etc. It's not our current vernacular but that's the black and white
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. Under broad heading of "Initiation" it draws distinction btwn what "commences" impeachment vs what can "trigger" it. 2 different things.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
I'm going to look bad if I totally forgot how to read but in whole section on Initiation, there's nothing abt latter step of a Resolution
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You will look bad; I linked to the examples cited in the CRS report — I actually researched beyond to the primary sources.
3 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
It says it can come through GJ or single member even if it hasnt before. But this prolly isn't best Hill for a Menschevik to die on :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, although this is a broken record bc you aren't interested in actually learning, that is NOT what it says.
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @craigaroo and
It says a single member can put forth a resolution. It says a grand jury report can be the ~underlying event~ that forms the basis of ...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
... a resolution to begin impeachment proceedings. That's it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.