"No, Impeachment Doesn't Work That Way," by me: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/no-impeachment-doesnt-work-that-way?utm_term=.ceGZyVd7eP#.hbdeRJdY6z … [
: Reuters]pic.twitter.com/BicKcEsSep
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'm not sure why we care about Hope Hick's legal opinions. I mean, that's like asking Trump to expound on the principles of good governance.
or integrity, or anything ...
I asked the White House for comment. They gave it. You needn't give it any credence bc it's not necessary to my conclusions.
I am hesitating as I'm trying to think of one thing with this WH to which I'de lend any credence under any circumstance
You're arguing w opposite of what I said. You don't need to give the WH comment any credence to concur in my conclusions. Have a great day.
Thought this was a conversation. Did not realize participation meant target practice for you. Thanks for making your intentions obvious.
Absurd that your unwillingness to listen to what I say becomes "target practice" bc I tell you you're not reading to what I've written.
I'm the one who wrote a careful, lengthy story describing a complex process. You're the one ignoring that bc you don't like the WH.
Trump PR Rep Hicks as your expert on the matter?
Can you ask Cole or Garvey clarification on "process may be triggered by non members"? 
Hicks is not "my expert." WH comment was sought; she gave it. It's not necessary for my conclusion.
As to the "non-member," try reading my story, which addresses that very point.
1. Fair enough about Hick's (just
considering true v false article). 2. Genuinely, I don't get 2469, how from Grand Jury to House floor?
I'd like to understand this better as well. Seems whatever "side", still unclear.
Grand jury report, through state legislature, to lawmaker (if I remember the example (but I'm not on my computer)).
(TY for ur time btw) More explanation please? Step by step clarification on this would help your readers with the speculation going on.
Why would we believe anything coming from @WhiteHouse? They're all sociopaths.
I asked the White House for comment. They gave it. You needn't give it any credence bc it's not necessary to my conclusions.
Just that their names were brought up should signal to People:-Trump's nervous about their inside information.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.