Here's that story:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/11/01/salaries-at-clintons-white-house/9c96f5b6-02c5-4888-87ee-dc547d8d93f0/?utm_term=.0f2345ce3520 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Chris Geidner Retweeted Claude Taylor
He's noted this previously:https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/863428254098751488 …
Chris Geidner added,
8 replies 3 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Anyway. The story is irresponsible, in addition to being unrelated to reality.
17 replies 21 retweets 161 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
1. The Supreme Court has nothing to do with impeachment. 2. The Supreme Court would not inform the president of "a case of impeachment."
49 replies 164 retweets 520 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
3. And, my favorite, the court does not stop the president from exercising his pardon authority as part of impeachment proceedings.
18 replies 69 retweets 256 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
4. And, the Marshal has nothing to do w/ any of this. EVEN IF the first 3 things were not so, it would be the clerk informing parties. :-(
6 replies 37 retweets 163 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Chris Geidner Retweeted Chris Geidner
This is about this (and, no, I'm not linking to the full article from M*nsch and Taylor):https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/866004691133620225 …
Chris Geidner added,
9 replies 35 retweets 148 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
If 50 "journo-lawyers" are gonna have daily snark-filled dick swinging contests with those 2 it's hard to believe this is about "integrity"
4 replies 4 retweets 100 likes -
Replying to @Kno
I'm not even sure what that means. A horribly ignorant article was posted, people are misinformed by it, so I corrected the record.
10 replies 11 retweets 140 likes
I've spent the past 10 hours responding to comments and explaining myself. If that's your conclusion, that's on you. Not me.
-
-
Thanks, buddy, for your condescending advice. Have a good night.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.