He's noted this previously:https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/863428254098751488 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Anyway. The story is irresponsible, in addition to being unrelated to reality.
17 replies 21 retweets 161 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
1. The Supreme Court has nothing to do with impeachment. 2. The Supreme Court would not inform the president of "a case of impeachment."
49 replies 164 retweets 520 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @nadabakos
I think we are in uncharted territory, folks.This is not impeachment of Clinton, nor Nixon. It's a nut job POTUS in cahoots with Russians/ 1
6 replies 10 retweets 56 likes -
I see
@LouiseMensch@TrueFactsStated breaking a lot of#trumprussia and you guys doing nothing but trashing them. So I am unfollowing YOU40 replies 98 retweets 637 likes -
Replying to @mami38_vargas @LouiseMensch and
Are all Trumpaholics allergic to facts?
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @audreyheffner @LouiseMensch and
You clearly have no clue who I am or what I do.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @CouchGenius @audreyheffner and
No. I'm not a "trumpaholic." I'm a reporter, and I've been quite critical of Trump, and led significant reporting on, for ex, travel ban.
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner @CouchGenius and
Reporter or lawyer? Make up your mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Go away.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.