Acting SG Wall says they don't know how many people will be affected by the order because the gov't hasn't been able to implement it.
-
-
Honestly, I've just been a bit off-kilter since Wall said he's not even read FDR's EO that resulted in the WWII internment camps.
-
Gould asks if the injunction can be affirmed on statutory grounds (if not Estab Cl). Katyal says yes.
-
Katyal reads out list of all the amici — faith groups, states, Cato — arguing that this is an Establishment Clause violation.
-
Wall is back up for rebuttal.
-
Wall's defense of Trump's comments at the EO signing: "He makes this six-word offhand comment."
-
Wall, in closing, does note the "overbreadth of the injunction" — hoping, at the least, for a narrowing of the injunction.
-
The two tweeting lawyers who argued against Acting SG Wall in the 4th and 9th Circuits last week and today:
@OmarJadwat &@neal_katyalpic.twitter.com/eu5mX1fMRW
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.