I am reading the Roy Moore decision. What a day.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
"Moore. No more." - my report on the ruling upholding Roy Moore's suspension from the Alabama Supreme Court,https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/roy-moores-suspension-as-alabamas-chief-justice-is-upheld?utm_term=.gnj2V5M9KP …
5 replies 38 retweets 71 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
This ruling. Boy, oh boy. The court affirmed the rulings on all six counts against him. https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/roy-moores-suspension-as-alabamas-chief-justice-is-upheld?utm_term=.urM5nl1G0J#.vj0x7OPJZL …pic.twitter.com/Zty7z6bjnf
4 replies 13 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
These are Alabama judges, unanimously ruling against Moore (although one didn't join the opinion). https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/roy-moores-suspension-as-alabamas-chief-justice-is-upheld?utm_term=.kw0rRLzGVx#.alaMlgBXLa …pic.twitter.com/WXfNVz6JoU
3 replies 11 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Note: Ct also ruled on Moore's claim that suspension pending trial on ethics charges violates due process—bc other judges will face charges.pic.twitter.com/2jO1JfXMC6
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Is it accurate to call the decision unanimous, or does the "concurs in result" make that not true? But, no dissents - or is THAT a dissent?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @garywright2
It's a unanimous decision. The opinion is not from all justices, but the final justice concurs in the result — meaning agrees with it.
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes
He might not agree w all the language, but he agrees with the decision of the court—affirming the Court of the Judiciary "in all respects."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.